Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status)

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, Kenneth Marshall <ktm(at)is(dot)rice(dot)edu>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Subject: Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status)
Date: 2006-08-16 12:28:53
Message-ID: 200608161428.56070.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Am Mittwoch, 16. August 2006 14:10 schrieb Robert Treat:
> I'm not sure I follow this, since currently anyone can email the bugs list
> or use the bugs -> email form from the website. Are you looking to
> increase the barrier for bug reporting?

Only a small fraction of the new posts on pgsql-bugs are actually bugs. Most
are confused or misdirected users. I don't want to raise that barrier. But
I want a higher barrier before something is recorded in the bug tracking
system.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2006-08-16 12:40:22 Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status)
Previous Message Robert Treat 2006-08-16 12:10:06 Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status)