| From: | Kenneth Marshall <ktm(at)it(dot)is(dot)rice(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, Kenneth Marshall <ktm(at)is(dot)rice(dot)edu>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status) |
| Date: | 2006-08-16 13:14:21 |
| Message-ID: | 20060816131421.GP13087@it.is.rice.edu |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 01:22:43PM +0900, Michael Glaesemann wrote:
>
> On Aug 16, 2006, at 12:29 , Tom Lane wrote:
>
> >So my current take on this would be that the bug tracker
> >would have to have a reasonable "output" email capability, but I'd not
> >necessarily insist on being able to "input" to it by mail.
>
> Setting aside the email in, how would people feel about Atom or RSS
> feeds as an alternative for alerts of activity in the system?
>
> Michael Glaesemann
> grzm seespotcode net
>
>
RT has an RSS output. A particular set of criteria can be used to
populate it on an individual basis.
Ken
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2006-08-16 13:14:47 | Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status) |
| Previous Message | Kenneth Marshall | 2006-08-16 13:09:33 | Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status) |