Re: Another reason to hate our name...

From: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
To: Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Another reason to hate our name...
Date: 2006-08-15 22:34:15
Message-ID: 20060815223415.GY21363@pervasive.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 03:33:31AM +0300, Devrim GUNDUZ wrote:
> Hello Jim,
>
> On Wed, 2006-08-09 at 18:21 -0500, Jim Nasby wrote:
> > http://www.google.com/trends?q=postgresql%2Cpostgres%
> > 2Cdb2&ctab=0&geo=all&date=all
> >
> > (Yes, I tried with MSSQL, Oracle and MySQL as well... the results...
> > weren't pretty)
>
> Did you also try with MS, OracleSQL and My? Removing SQL from Postgre(s)
> is the same as this, I think.

How is 'My' at all equivalent to 'MySQL'??

Apparently my point was too subtle... If people weren't inconsistently
searching for Postgres instead of PostgreSQL we would be above DB2 in
search volume, which I think is a milestone.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Hallgren 2006-08-16 07:56:29 Sun to release Java as Open Source
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2006-08-11 18:52:27 Re: call for papers / postgresql participation ?