Re: Postgresql Performance on an HP DL385 and

From: Michael Stone <mstone+postgres(at)mathom(dot)us>
To: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgresql Performance on an HP DL385 and
Date: 2006-08-15 17:26:46
Message-ID: 20060815172645.GU2900@mathom.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 11:29:26AM -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
>Are 'we' sure that such a setup can't lose any data?

Yes. If you check the archives, you can even find the last time this was
discussed...

The bottom line is that the only reason you need a metadata journalling
filesystem is to save the fsck time when you come up. On a little
partition like xlog, that's not an issue.

Mike Stone

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message mark 2006-08-15 18:31:48 Re: Postgresql Performance on an HP DL385 and
Previous Message Michael Stone 2006-08-15 17:25:21 Re: Postgresql Performance on an HP DL385 and