| From: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Steve Poe <steve(dot)poe(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Postgresql Performance on an HP DL385 and |
| Date: | 2006-08-15 16:29:26 |
| Message-ID: | 20060815162926.GS27928@pervasive.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 01:09:04PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 12:05:46PM -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> >Wow, interesting. IIRC, XFS is lower performing than ext3,
>
> For xlog, maybe. For data, no. Both are definately slower than ext2 for
> xlog, which is another reason to have xlog on a small filesystem which
> doesn't need metadata journalling.
Are 'we' sure that such a setup can't lose any data? I'm worried about
files getting lost when they get written out before the metadata does.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-08-15 16:56:02 | Re: Inner Join of the same table |
| Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-08-15 16:25:24 | Re: Postgresql Performance on an HP DL385 and |