Re: [HACKERS] SO_SNDBUF size is small on win32?

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Yoshiyuki Asaba <y-asaba(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] SO_SNDBUF size is small on win32?
Date: 2006-08-14 02:38:08
Message-ID: 200608140238.k7E2c8r29710@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Yoshiyuki Asaba wrote:
> Hi,
>
> From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
> Subject: Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] SO_SNDBUF size is small on win32?
> Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 16:44:23 -0400 (EDT)
>
> > Based on this patch and comments, I have applied a patch that sets the
> > buffer to 32k, and adds the URL in a comment.
>
> Is it backported to 8.1.x and 8.0.x?

No, it is too untested for backpatching, in my opinion.

--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-08-14 02:40:02 I am away Monday to Friday
Previous Message Satoshi Nagayasu 2006-08-14 02:33:19 Re: pgstattuple extension for indexes

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-08-14 02:43:50 Re: Forcing current WAL file to be archived
Previous Message Satoshi Nagayasu 2006-08-14 02:33:19 Re: pgstattuple extension for indexes