Re: plpgsql and INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE RETURNING

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: plpgsql and INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE RETURNING
Date: 2006-08-14 02:30:00
Message-ID: 200608140230.k7E2U0x28810@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> With STRICT: you get an error unless exactly one row is affected.
>
> This prevents the incomplete-execution problem.
>
> BTW, some googling indicates that Oracle's equivalent PL/SQL construct
> supports only the exactly-one-row case. But they have an alternative,
> which is that you can use aggregate functions in the RETURNING list and
> get a single-row result that is aggregated across all affected rows.
> It's too late to consider implementing that for 8.2, I fear, but I think
> maybe we should put it on the TODO list for later.

Interesting, an aggregate to combine the rows. Remembering how much
trouble/discussion the STRICT was, I am unsure if we should add this to
the TODO unless we get someone who likes it. ;-)

--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Satoshi Nagayasu 2006-08-14 02:33:19 Re: pgstattuple extension for indexes
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-08-14 02:27:37 Re: [PATCHES] Custom variable class segmentation fault