| From: | José Orlando Pereira <jop(at)lsd(dot)di(dot)uminho(dot)pt> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Markus Schiltknecht <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch> |
| Cc: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)skype(dot)net>, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, alfranio correia junior <alfranio(at)lsd(dot)di(dot)uminho(dot)pt>, Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: standard interfaces for replication providers |
| Date: | 2006-08-10 14:00:15 |
| Message-ID: | 200608101500.16468.jop@lsd.di.uminho.pt |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wednesday 09 August 2006 20:57, Hannu Krosing wrote:
> >
> > Why reinvent the wheel for everything if there was an interface that
> > offered some of the needed functionality? Maybe PostgreSQL-R is simply
> > too deep in the database for any of this to be useful, but I'm 99%
> > certain that Slony could make use of some of this stuff, such as a hook
> > on tuples being written out.
>
> Slonys problems ar *not* in getting access to tuples written out. Why
> fix something that aint broken ?
The current implementation of GAPI on PostgreSQL uses the same approach as
Slony-I to extract the write-set. The difference is that it can push them out
immediatly on commit, as required for eager update.
--
Jose Orlando Pereira
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2006-08-10 14:03:07 | Re: Casts |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-08-10 13:38:10 | Re: [BUGS] numerics lose scale and precision in views of unions |