Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] log_statement output for protocol

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com>, Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>, Csaba Nagy <nagy(at)ecircle-ag(dot)com>, Postgres JDBC <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] log_statement output for protocol
Date: 2006-08-08 01:23:26
Message-ID: 200608080123.k781NQ222085@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc pgsql-patches


Applied. Changes are:

For protocol-level prepare/bind/execute:

o print user name for all
o print portal name if defined for all
o print query for all
o reduce log_statement header to single keyword
o print bind parameters as DETAIL if text mode

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Sorry, forgot to show sample output:
>
> LOG: prepare sel1: SELECT $1 + $2;
> LOG: bind sel1: SELECT $1 + $2;
> DETAIL: $1 = "8", $2 = "5"
> LOG: execute sel1: SELECT $1 + $2;
>
> LOG: prepare sel1: SELECT 3;
> LOG: bind sel1: SELECT 3;
> LOG: execute sel1: SELECT 3;
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > Tom Lane wrote:
> > > > Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com> writes:
> > > > > A 50-parameter query could be .. interesting ..
> > > >
> > > > > I realize that you need this level of output to reflect what is
> > > > > happening at the protocol level, but seeing all the protocol detail is
> > > > > not really what you expect when you turn on basic statement logging, is it?
> > > >
> > > > Well, we've certainly been beat up often enough about the lack of
> > > > logging bind parameter values --- I don't think there's any question
> > > > about the importance of printing them. I agree that the proposed format
> > > > is much too verbose though. In particular, a separate LOG message per
> > > > parameter is NOT what I had in mind; I want them in DETAIL lines of the
> > > > bind log message. (This'd perhaps also address Oliver's issue, since
> > > > if you didn't want to see the values you could turn down
> > > > log_error_verbosity.)
> > >
> > > OK, I will continue in that direction. Will post a new patch.
> >
> > Updated patch attached. It prints the text bind parameters on a single
> > detail line. I still have not seen portal names generated by libpq.
>
> --
> Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
> EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
>
> + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-08-08 02:01:15 Re: "Constraint exclusion" is not general enough
Previous Message Florian G. Pflug 2006-08-07 23:53:11 Re: "Constraint exclusion" is not general enough

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message James Im 2006-08-09 10:21:53 SQL query never ends
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-08-07 03:47:04 Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] log_statement output for protocol

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message ITAGAKI Takahiro 2006-08-08 03:16:53 Re: CSStorm occurred again by postgreSQL8.2
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-08-07 20:27:41 Re: CSStorm occurred again by postgreSQL8.2