Re: 8.2 features status

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Subject: Re: 8.2 features status
Date: 2006-08-05 07:43:01
Message-ID: 200608050943.02740.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Frankly, I don't care if we ever get a bug tracker or use trac.
> However a more formalized communication process is sorely needed
> IMHO.

There's also supposed to be a wiki set up. There, people can try to
make up tracking lists, project management, task lists, release goals
or whatever on their own. If patterns emerge, we can "formalize" them,
but I feel this would be a good way to try things out.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2006-08-05 08:01:30 interesting article: Leverage your PostgreSQL V8.1 skills to learn DB2, Version
Previous Message Oliver Jowett 2006-08-05 07:39:48 Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] log_statement output for protocol