Re: 8.2 features status

Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 12:40:01PM -0700, David Fetter wrote:
> > While I am not going to reopen the can of worms labeled 'bug tracker',
> > I think it would be good to have a little more formality as far as
> > claiming items goes.
>
> Agreed.
>
> > I'm picturing something like this:
> >
> > 1. Each person taking an item agrees to write at least one email each
> > week to -hackers detailing progress or lack of same on the item.
> >
> > 2. Should someone wish to relinquish a claim on a feature, there needs
> > to be some standard way to do a hand-off of whatever they've
> > done/found and announce that the feature is now available to others to
> > claim.
> >
> > 3. Should the person claiming the feature not communicate to -hackers
> > for some period--I'm thinking 3 weeks is about right--the item goes
> > back in the unclaimed pool with a message to -hackers saying that
> > that's what's happened.
> >
> > What say?
>
> It's a shame to have a person burn cycles on this, but anything would be
> an improvement over what we've got now. --------

Really?

--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +