Re: 8.2 features status

From: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 8.2 features status
Date: 2006-08-04 19:32:12
Message-ID: 20060804193211.GQ40481@pervasive.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 03:18:37PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> writes:
> > BTW, while I'm thinking about it, I believe INSERT ... RETURNING is in,
> > no?
>
> There's a recently-submitted patch, but it's not been reviewed yet,
> so it's premature to say "it's in". See upthread comments about
> promising things in advance of them hitting CVS ...

True, but I didn't remember seeing it in your list of
yet-to-be-committed patches, so I thought I'd mention it.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-08-04 19:38:22 Re: "Constraint exclusion" is not general enough
Previous Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-08-04 19:30:31 Re: pg_upgrade (was: 8.2 features status)