From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Replication Documentation |
Date: | 2006-08-01 20:40:28 |
Message-ID: | 20060801204028.GB19514@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Chris Browne wrote:
> Here's a patch to add in the material on replication recently
> discussed on pgsql.docs. I'm not thrilled that there were only a few
> comments made; I'd be happy to see "slicing and dicing" to see this
> made more useful.
s/e.g. -/e.g.,/
s/ - /–/
The indentation of the SGML file seems at odds with our conventions (we
don't use tabs, for one thing.)
You mention this:
> <para> Common methods include having triggers on tables,
> capturing SQL statements, and capturing transaction log (WAL)
> updates </para>
However you don't mention anything about WAL captures. Mentioning that
PITR is one of these would be good.
In the last few paragraphs, the title is about Postgres-R but then you
comment on Slony-II. Should the title mention both?
> <para> As a result of those problems, Slony-II efforts have fallen
> off somewhat. </para>
s/those/these/ ?
Otherwise looks good to my untrained eyes.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joe Conway | 2006-08-01 20:41:28 | Re: Values list-of-targetlists patch for comments (was Re: [PATCHES] |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2006-08-01 20:26:44 | Re: Values list-of-targetlists patch for comments (was Re: [PATCHES] 8.2 features?) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joe Conway | 2006-08-01 20:41:28 | Re: Values list-of-targetlists patch for comments (was Re: [PATCHES] |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2006-08-01 20:26:44 | Re: Values list-of-targetlists patch for comments (was Re: [PATCHES] 8.2 features?) |