Re: lastval exposes information that currval does not

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Phil Frost <indigo(at)bitglue(dot)com>
Subject: Re: lastval exposes information that currval does not
Date: 2006-07-27 16:36:30
Message-ID: 200607271836.30900.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Phil Frost wrote:
> All right, I give up. I guess no one seems to want to admit this is a
> bad security policy, or accurately document it. Does that make it an
> easter egg?

I'm sure some people agree that there is a problem. It would help,
however, if you were not talking about two different things at once.
And it would help if you actually proposed a change that would improve
matters.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2006-07-27 16:38:55 Re: GUC with units, details
Previous Message Bort, Paul 2006-07-27 16:30:08 Re: GUC with units, details