Re: url for TODO item, is it right?

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: url for TODO item, is it right?
Date: 2006-07-18 19:09:09
Message-ID: 200607181909.k6IJ99K15301@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
[ There is text before PGP section. ]
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> >> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-www/2006-07/msg00061.php
> >
> > Yeah. I think the TODO item is intended to point to what is now
> > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-02/msg00163.php
> > or one of the earlier messages in that thread.
>
> This is a very ugly problem. Note that there are also URLs that cannot
> be changed, such as older messages that point to archive posts, and
> many places on the web outside of our control.
>
> Why can't we just write a script that creates new numbers as needed,
> such as msg00163.1.php and msg00163.2.php? As far as I can tell, there
> is nothing magical about the naming schema itself that would cause
> such URLs to break anything.

Agreed. It is nice to have the emails numbered in arrival order, but
changes to old URLs are worse.

--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-07-18 19:20:40 Re: src/tools/pginclude considered harmful (was Re:
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-07-18 19:07:53 Re: url for TODO item, is it right?