| From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pgsql-patches considered harmful |
| Date: | 2006-07-10 20:53:49 |
| Message-ID: | 20060710175328.I957@ganymede.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 10 Jul 2006, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Martjin, Greg, Marc, etc.:
>
>> However, I think the other suggestions of having the listbot mangle the
>> reply-tos of -patches and -committers to be -hackers would probably be
>> good too. I myself subscribe to -committers in digest form (where I
>> look at the summary to see if it's interesting) and read -patches
>> occasionally via the archives to see if anything is there...
>
> I agree that mangling the reply-tos would be the least complex (and thus
> probably best) solution. Unlike attachment stripping, this is supported by
> majordomo.
>
> However, to save on spam filtering, the reply-to should add -hackers *also*,
> not instead.
You've lost me on that last point ... how does that save on spam
filtering?
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org MSN . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2006-07-10 20:56:41 | Re: pgsql-patches considered harmful |
| Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2006-07-10 20:52:30 | Re: pgsql-patches considered harmful |