Re: Anyone still care about Cygwin? (was Re: [CORE] GPL

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, "Robert Treat" <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Devrim GUNDUZ" <devrim(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Anyone still care about Cygwin? (was Re: [CORE] GPL
Date: 2006-06-26 17:43:28
Message-ID: 200606261043.28646.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dave, all,

> Ahh, you miss the point though - they vanish back into the woodwork when
> they realise that they can't brag that they host the entire project.
> It's not that they want to help, they just want maximum publicity off
> our name for as little hardware as possible.

I seem to have missed a cycle. Who are we talking about?

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2006-06-26 17:58:23 Re: [PATCHES] Non-transactional pg_class, try 2
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-06-26 17:32:04 Re: [HACKERS] Overhead for stats_command_string et al, take 2