Re: PAM auth

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Satoshi Nagayasu <nagayasus(at)nttdata(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Albe Laurenz <all(at)adv(dot)magwien(dot)gv(dot)at>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PAM auth
Date: 2006-06-20 13:05:07
Message-ID: 20060620130507.GI26882@surnet.cl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Satoshi Nagayasu wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >don't use system auth. PAM can authenticate from many sources, not just
> >the system password files. LDAP is a commonly used source.
>
> The reason why I'm trying to use PAM, is I need a feature
> to account lock-out after N-times login failures on PG,
> like pam_tally module.

I think Andrew is suggesting using LDAP atop PAM, so you'd be able to
use pam_tally anyway -- just switch away from "system-auth".

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2006-06-20 13:14:09 Re: shall we have a TRACE_MEMORY mode
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2006-06-20 12:57:14 Re: shall we have a TRACE_MEMORY mode