| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] drop if exists remainder |
| Date: | 2006-06-08 00:24:25 |
| Message-ID: | 200606071724.26441.josh@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Tom,
> > > What's the consensus on this? Nobody else has chimed in, so I'm
> > > inclined to do no more on the gounds of insufficient demand. Let's
> > > decide before too much bitrot occurs, though.
> >
> > +1 :)
>
> +1
We were talking about this on IRC, and I feel that if we're going to do "IF
EXISTS" for any objects, we should do it for all objects. Otherwise we
risk a considerable amount of user confusion.
--
--Josh
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Glaesemann | 2006-06-08 00:25:00 | Re: ADD/DROP INHERITS |
| Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2006-06-08 00:22:35 | Re: drop if exists remainder |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Treat | 2006-06-08 03:13:51 | update link / fix spelling error |
| Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2006-06-08 00:22:35 | Re: drop if exists remainder |