Re: PostgreSQL Update + (PGISDBRU) PGSQL is Slow Debunked by Real Users

From: <operationsengineer1(at)yahoo(dot)com>
To: Andrej Ricnik-Bay <andrej(dot)groups(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Update + (PGISDBRU) PGSQL is Slow Debunked by Real Users
Date: 2006-05-24 19:57:15
Message-ID: 20060524195715.42444.qmail@web33312.mail.mud.yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-novice

> On 5/25/06, operationsengineer1(at)yahoo(dot)com
> > imho, both are acceptably fast for the vast
> majority
> > of applications (which is why i went with features
> -
> > not the least of which was the license) and if it
> gets
> > so big it grinds to a halt, you are likely in the
> > commercial db space, anyway.
> /me has seen highly expensive, poorly designed
> Oracle implementations
> on amazing hardware grind to a halt ... :}

touche! from what i could tell, the fix was mostly to
prevent bad php developing from allowing sql
injection. iow, it wasn't an inherent problem in
pgsql assuming good programming practices... using
bind variables in your queries.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-novice by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Brad Nicholson 2006-05-24 21:10:45 Re: PostgreSQL Update + (PGISDBRU) PGSQL is Slow Debunked
Previous Message Andrej Ricnik-Bay 2006-05-24 18:25:22 Re: PostgreSQL Update + (PGISDBRU) PGSQL is Slow Debunked by Real Users