| From: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Sriram Dandapani <sdandapani(at)counterpane(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: autovacuum for large periodic deletes |
| Date: | 2006-05-17 22:24:45 |
| Message-ID: | 20060517222445.GJ42612@pervasive.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 03:18:45PM -0700, Sriram Dandapani wrote:
> Looks like partitioning may seem the way to go. I have been hesitant
> about using partitioning as the feature is very new. How do I manage the
> free space map if I do not use partitioning?
Make it very large. Or read the detailed description at
http://lnk.nu/pervasivepostgres.com/9hg.aspx
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-05-18 03:24:45 | Re: does wal archiving block the current client connection? |
| Previous Message | Sriram Dandapani | 2006-05-17 22:18:45 | Re: autovacuum for large periodic deletes |