| From: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Hogan, James F(dot) Jr(dot)" <JHogan(at)seton(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: audit table containing Select statements submitted |
| Date: | 2006-05-15 16:02:40 |
| Message-ID: | 20060515160240.GQ26212@pervasive.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 10:55:43AM -0500, Hogan, James F. Jr. wrote:
> Only specific tables.
>
> Of the 150 plus existing there are only 8 or 10 that hold sensitive
> data.
In that case I'd definately go with the suggestion of creating access
functions and logging to a table from within them. Just make sure to
mark the functions as volatile.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Frost | 2006-05-15 16:28:25 | does wal archiving block the current client connection? |
| Previous Message | Hogan, James F. Jr. | 2006-05-15 15:55:43 | Re: audit table containing Select statements submitted |