| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Dhanaraj M <Dhanaraj(dot)M(at)sun(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: TODO items.. |
| Date: | 2006-04-23 15:55:40 |
| Message-ID: | 20060423155540.GV4474@ns.snowman.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* Robert Treat (xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net) wrote:
> On Saturday 22 April 2006 13:34, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Also, the TODO item could be worded
> >
> > * Make psql's \d commands more consistent
> >
> > because that's really what Neil is on about ...
> >
>
> like making \df only show user functions and \dfS show system functions, like
> all the other objects? :-)
How about also having it show the owner (instead of having to use \df+
which gets huge...) and the permissions... Or perhaps have a seperate
\dfp or something to get that information. It's annoying to have to
either query the catalog directly or look through \df+ for why I can't
drop a given function.
Thanks,
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-04-23 17:47:25 | Re: using dll in am |
| Previous Message | David Hoksza | 2006-04-23 15:48:31 | using dll in am |