Re: Autovacuum ideas

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Chris Hoover <revoohc(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Anthony Ransley <anthonyr(at)aurema(dot)com>, "pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Autovacuum ideas
Date: 2006-04-12 15:15:53
Message-ID: 20060412151553.GD23855@surnet.cl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Chris Hoover wrote:
> This is what we are doing today (except we are on Linux :) ). However,
> since there is talk of making autovacuum on by default and the advantages of
> having it run, it would be nice to be able to block out hours that it can
> not run. It would also be very nice to have the database take care of all
> of this via the config file and/or tables. That way, no external programs
> (cron or what ever) would be needed.
>
> Even nicer would be to have the time exclusion granular enough to be table
> to exclude only certain tables. That way autovacuum can do it's work as
> needed on the majority of the tables, but tables that the DBA knows will
> cause problems during business hours could be excluded until the slow time.
>
> Any comments on this?

I don't think autovacuum will be on by default until we have a way to
configure rush hours, maintenance windows, etc.

The system I envision has tables grouped in some way, and maintenance
windows would operate on table groups. For example you will be able to
include the fat table in a (possibly otherwise empty) group, and have
that group not be processed during "work hours"; the rest of the tables
would continue to be vacuumed at all times.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Darcy Buskermolen 2006-04-12 15:39:08 Re: Autovacuum ideas
Previous Message Chris Hoover 2006-04-12 14:53:51 Re: Autovacuum ideas