Re: Remote administration contrib module

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Remote administration contrib module
Date: 2006-04-10 21:49:39
Message-ID: 200604102149.k3ALndw10449@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I think the issue was that adding these fuctions adds a potential
> > security opening, so we didn't want it in core by default, but
> > /contrib seems logical because anyone who needs it can just add it.
>
> Well, if there are security issues, then this is a poor fix. A lot of
> people use pgAdmin, many of them less experienced with PostgreSQL, so
> before long all of these functions are going to be installed at many
> sites anyway. If there are _security_ issues, they need to be fixed
> before things go into contrib.

The logic is why add functionality by default that can be used as a
potential security hole if you are not using it.

> > This is similar to the fact we don't include plpgsql by default in
> > databases, for the same reason,
>
> I doubt that that is really the reason.

It actually is the reason I have heard.

--
Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-04-10 22:03:29 Re: [GENERAL] PANIC: heap_update_redo: no block
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2006-04-10 21:42:59 Re: Remote administration contrib module