Re: Suggestion: Which Binary?

From: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: David Wheeler <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Suggestion: Which Binary?
Date: 2006-04-01 15:21:14
Message-ID: 20060401152114.GH49405@pervasive.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 07:01:18PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> David Wheeler <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> writes:
> > Yes, but even the environment variables get me what I want. I
> > therefore respectfully submit the attached patch to document them in
> > the INSTALL file.
>
> It seems rather pointless to document two instances of what is in fact
> a generic autoconf-script behavior ...

The problem is that PostgreSQL is moving out of the realm of "hard-core
geeks only" and more into the mainstream. I'd bet a number of our users
have very little idea how autoconf and it's progeny work. It's probably
not unlikely that those folks would be able to figure out where their
perl was, but then not know how to tell it to configure.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2006-04-01 15:34:57 Re: Suggestion: Which Binary?
Previous Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-04-01 15:15:19 Re: pg_class catalog question...

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2006-04-01 15:34:57 Re: Suggestion: Which Binary?
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2006-04-01 14:58:51 Re: Suggestion: Which Binary?