Re: Role incompatibilities

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Role incompatibilities
Date: 2006-03-25 12:59:15
Message-ID: 200603251359.16144.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Am Samstag, 25. März 2006 01:02 schrieb Stephen Frost:
> If there are use cases where what we're doing is causing problems for
> users who are looking for what the SQL spec has exactly, please let us
> know.. Given that other databases don't religiously follow the SQL spec
> wrt roles either makes me suspect you won't find too cases like that..

My concern here is to arrive at a standards conforming role system. Clearly
we've established that the current one doesn't do it. Moreover, I'm now
convinced that some aspects of the current implementation arose from an
attempt to implement the standard but failed because of misunderstandings.
I'd be interested to know what incompatibilities you have found in other
database systems, so we know what we're dealing with.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-03-25 13:02:22 Re: Domains as Subtypes
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2006-03-25 12:24:00 Re: [PATCHES] Automatically setting work_mem