From: | "Joel Miller" <joelwmiller(at)sbcglobal(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | "Martijn van Oosterhout" <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
Cc: | "PostgreSQL Hackers List" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [SUGGESTION] CVSync |
Date: | 2006-03-24 00:30:10 |
Message-ID: | 20060324003010.1208@smtp.sbcglobal.yahoo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Plain old cvs doesn't work for me because I need to get the repository,
not just a checkout of the sources, so I can do diffs, browse old
versions and what-not. I find that it's easier to understand code that's
been around for a while if I can observe how it's changed over time.
Usually, when I have time to these things, it also happens that I am
offline without access to a net connection.
Thanks!
Joel
On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 2:50 PM, Martijn van Oosterhout
(kleptog(at)svana(dot)org) wrote:
>
>Any particular reason why straight CVS doesn't work for you? Are you
>that interested in having the log comment locally?
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kurt Roeckx | 2006-03-24 00:34:43 | Re: [SUGGESTION] CVSync |
Previous Message | Rod Taylor | 2006-03-24 00:26:15 | Re: Did this work in earlier version of Postgres? |