Re: Negative offsets

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: CSN <cool_screen_name90001(at)yahoo(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Negative offsets
Date: 2006-03-03 02:44:39
Message-ID: 200603030244.k232idf29110@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> CSN wrote:
> > I was playing around with negative offsets:
> >
> > select * from table1 order by col1 offset -5 limit 25;
> > select * from table1 order by col1 offset -25 limit
> > 25;
> > select * from table1 order by col1 offset -250 limit
> > 25;
> >
> > They all return the same resultset (offset 0). Is
> > there even any point in allowing negative offsets -
> > such as maybe someday they'll offset backwards?
>
> Actually we allow negative offsets and limits. Seems we should disallow
> them. Yes, it would be interesting if they did offsets relative to the
> end of the result set.

Seems most people just want to leave our current behavior unchanged.

--
Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us
SRA OSS, Inc. http://www.sraoss.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Perez 2006-03-03 03:07:25 xml and utf-8
Previous Message Christopher Browne 2006-03-03 02:40:17 Re: Solaris 10 ZFS Postgresql request for comments