| From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Pgfoundry and gborg: shut one down |
| Date: | 2006-02-22 20:26:27 |
| Message-ID: | 20060222162524.J1931@ganymede.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 22 Feb 2006, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> So, is there a formal project setup anywhere for the migration? ISTM
> that it would be best to create a project on either gborg or pgfoundry
> with the intention that it produce a set of code/scripts/procedures that
> allow for migrating projects from gborg to pgfoundry, since obviously
> moving lists over is a minor portion of the effort.
Actually, we've even got a prelim script setup for moving teh database
that I have to spend some time testing, after which we can start moving
...
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2006-02-22 21:50:49 | Re: Request: set opclass for generated unique and primary key indexes |
| Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-02-22 18:59:36 | Re: Pgfoundry and gborg: shut one down |