Re: Pgfoundry and gborg: shut one down

From: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Pgfoundry and gborg: shut one down
Date: 2006-02-18 18:46:11
Message-ID: 20060218184611.GF20716@svana.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 09:31:18AM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Having run had both pgfoundary and gborg for several years, I think we
> have to conclude that any clean migration is never going to happen, so
> let's just pick a server and announce date, and shut one of them off.

Well, first you need to mark one as deprecated. Looking at both sites I
don't see anything indicating that either is to be preferred. You can
still sign up to both of them. How is one to know a migration is
expected?

Secondly, say I have a project to migrate, what next? Googling for
"gborg migration" doesn't bring up anything useful.

Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Patent. n. Genius is 5% inspiration and 95% perspiration. A patent is a
> tool for doing 5% of the work and then sitting around waiting for someone
> else to do the other 95% so you can sue them.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2006-02-18 18:52:22 Config file for psql
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-02-18 18:34:11 Re: Pgfoundry and gborg: shut one down