| From: | "Brian A(dot) Seklecki" <lavalamp(at)spiritual-machines(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bradley Kieser <brad(at)kieser(dot)net> |
| Cc: | bseklecki(at)collaborativefusion(dot)com, slony1-general(at)gborg(dot)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: "Blueprints for High Availability" |
| Date: | 2006-01-23 17:40:10 |
| Message-ID: | 20060123123857.H37425@arbitor.digitalfreaks.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006, Bradley Kieser wrote:
> Bas, I am working on an integration technique that solves these problems and
> is already showing tremendous promise. It's in production use in a very high
> pressure environment but suffice to say it's an integration of what's out
> there (I am 100% Linux based so don't expect anything but Linux).
>
> Once it is completed and I feel that I can present it to a wider audience
> such as this one, I will formally announce it and seek a peer review process.
>
> But let's just say that it is possible, RIGHT NOW, to get full redundancy and
> failover that works, it OpenSource and runs on cheap hardware.
>
That's exciting news. I'll look forward to hearing back from you.
~BAS
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ciprian Hodorogea | 2006-01-24 08:33:50 | Re: pg_dump - txt sql vs binary |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-01-23 17:23:05 | Re: pg_dump - txt sql vs binary |