| From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, gforge-admins(at)pgfoundry(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PgFoundry Move |
| Date: | 2006-01-16 21:48:00 |
| Message-ID: | 20060116174447.S28752@ganymede.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Mon, 16 Jan 2006, Robert Treat wrote:
> based on my interaction with the foundry admins, afaict the single thing
> stopping us from getting pgfoundry onto a new server is that we're
> trying to do it on bsd (reread fetters' email for a good synopisis of
> this). At what point do we decide moving forward is more important than
> the os we are putting it on?
Never, cause the longer it takes to move it, the less requirement there is
to move it as I bring on better/more powerful servers *shrug*
Within the next month or so, we'll have a new 64bit server going online,
which I'll be able to move pgfoundry over to that has faster drives and
more memory *shrug*
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Glaesemann | 2006-01-16 21:51:15 | Re: source documentation tool doxygen |
| Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2006-01-16 21:37:28 | Re: PgFoundry Move |