| From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: cvs update taking a long time |
| Date: | 2006-01-11 03:39:24 |
| Message-ID: | 20060110233840.H1006@ganymede.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006, Michael Fuhr wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 07:44:23PM -0700, Michael Fuhr wrote:
>> I just ran "cvs update" in my 8.1 source tree and it took nearly
>> 25 minutes to complete; it usually takes about 30-60 seconds. Is
>> anybody else seeing problems?
>
> I forgot to mention that this is anonymous cvs (anoncvs.postgresql.org).
Should be fixed ... there were a whack of stale/old processes running,
restarted the vServer and machien is feeling more responsive now ... let
me know if you see it again... (or are still!)
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tony Caduto | 2006-01-11 03:52:20 | Re: Question about Postgresql time fields(possible bug) |
| Previous Message | Michael Fuhr | 2006-01-11 02:45:34 | Re: cvs update taking a long time |