Re: Fw: Is anyone interested in getting PostgreSQL working

I see that also, What I am testing now, it downgrading gcc to the sarge versions. If it works on testing then I know
it's a gcc issue.

Jim

---------- Original Message -----------
From: Kurt Roeckx <kurt(at)roeckx(dot)be>
To: Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, jim(at)contactbda(dot)com
Sent: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 16:57:36 +0100
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Fw: Is anyone interested in getting PostgreSQL working

> On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 03:03:28PM +0100, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
> > >
> > >well that is good news, can you tell me what version of linux you are
> > >using and what gcc version also. I will let
> > >Martin know.
> >
> >
> > lionfish is a stock Debian/Sarge box (a cobalt cube) with gcc 3.3.5.
>
> Martin is probably trying this on unstable, which means new
> binutils, glibc and gcc-3.3.
>
> Toolchain looks like this on unstable:
> libc6-dev 2.3.5-11
> linux-kernel-headers 2.6.13+0rc3-2
> binutils 2.16.1cvs20051214-1
> gcc-3.3 3.3.6-12
> gcc-3.4 3.4.5-1
> gcc-4.0 4.0.2-6
>
> Where stable/sarge has:
> libc6-dev 2.3.2.ds1-22
> linux-kernel-headers 2.5.999-test7-bk-17
> binutils 2.15-6
> gcc-3.3 3.3.5-13
> gcc-3.4 3.4.3-13 (which you probably don't use)
>
> Kurt
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
------- End of Original Message -------