From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Jaime Casanova <systemguards(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: mark wath catalogs are shared - was:(Re: [NOVICE] which database |
Date: | 2006-01-04 16:08:23 |
Message-ID: | 200601041608.k04G8N629967@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Jaime Casanova <systemguards(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > On 1/3/06, pres <pgn(dot)lists(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >> i would find it helpful if Table 42-1 included a column that identified
> >> whehter each catalog is shared or not. convenient, but given that the
> >> documentation does contain it, not necessary.
>
> > is this acceptable or usefull? if so, i can do it after work...
>
> It seems like clutter to me. Whether a catalog is shared or not is not
> necessarily the first thing you want to know about it.
I am thinking the table should be split into two, one for the global
tables, and another for the db-local tables. I don't think we make it
clear enough which tables are global.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-01-04 16:16:15 | Re: mark wath catalogs are shared - was:(Re: [NOVICE] which database to login to to create global users?) |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-01-04 15:46:14 | Re: mark wath catalogs are shared - was:(Re: [NOVICE] which database to login to to create global users?) |