Re: Forum Software

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: "Scott Marlowe" <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com>, "Harry Jackson" <harryjackson(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Forum Software
Date: 2005-12-30 20:55:16
Message-ID: 200512301555.17760.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Friday 30 December 2005 13:03, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On 12/30/05, Raymond O'Donnell <rod(at)iol(dot)ie> wrote:
>
> QUOTE:
> and they have a
> tendency to ignore certain exploits in any releases that are not
> current.
> UNQUOTE:
>
> That's hardly fair. PostgreSQL also ignores security issues on older
> versions. If you're running 8.0.0 and a security fix came out in 8.0.1,
> it's your fault, not the PGDG folks.
>

I think he is saying that if an exploit is found in pg 8.1.x, there policy is
to never backpatch to 8.0.x. If so that's a fair criticism (to the extent
that upgrades are cumbersome with their software)

Just to be clear, I am not validating his statement, just wondering if you
misinterpreted it. I've certainly heard more bad than good about phpbb, but
I've no first hand experience and it could be a wonderful product. (From this
thread it just sounds like they need a little more structure in the project)

--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message CSN 2005-12-30 21:30:40 unique constraint with a null column?
Previous Message CSN 2005-12-30 20:09:12 Delete / F/K error