Re: SAN/NAS options

From: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
To: Charles Sprickman <spork(at)bway(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SAN/NAS options
Date: 2005-12-16 22:19:09
Message-ID: 20051216221909.GU53809@pervasive.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 01:56:10AM -0500, Charles Sprickman wrote:
You'll note that I'm being somewhat driven by my OS of choice, FreeBSD.
> Unlike Solaris or other commercial offerings, there is no nice volume
> management available. While I'd love to keep managing a dozen or so
> FreeBSD boxes, I could be persuaded to go to Solaris x86 if the volume
> management really shines and Postgres performs well on it.

Have you looked at vinum? It might not qualify as a true volume manager,
but it's still pretty handy.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim C. Nasby 2005-12-16 22:38:46 Re: Overriding the optimizer
Previous Message Jim C. Nasby 2005-12-16 22:18:01 Re: SAN/NAS options