Re: Memory Leakage Problem

From: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Mike Rylander <mrylander(at)gmail(dot)com>, Will Glynn <wglynn(at)freedomhealthcare(dot)org>, pgsql general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Memory Leakage Problem
Date: 2005-12-13 08:22:34
Message-ID: 20051213082234.GG20728@pervasive.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-performance

On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 08:31:52PM -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >
> >>It sure is. Gentoo with kernel version 2.6.12, built for x86_64.
> >>Looks like we have a contender for the common factor. :)
> >>
> >
> >Please tell me you're *not* running a production database on Gentoo.
> >
> >
> > regards, tom lane
> >
> You don't even want to know how many companies I know that are doing
> this very thing and no, it was not my suggestion.

"Like the annoying teenager next door with a 90hp import sporting a 6
foot tall bolt-on wing, Gentoo users are proof that society is best
served by roving gangs of armed vigilantes, dishing out swift, cold
justice with baseball bats..."
http://funroll-loops.org/

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sim Zacks 2005-12-13 08:43:14 Re: pg_autovacuum
Previous Message Anand Kumria 2005-12-13 08:16:47 Re: Bug#342369: PostgreSQL 8.1.0 RHEL / Debian incompatible packages

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pandurangan R S 2005-12-13 11:40:11 Re: partitioning
Previous Message Marc Cousin 2005-12-13 08:20:47 partitioning