| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | Marc Herbert <Marc(dot)Herbert(at)continuent(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: BLOB handling compatibility with PostgreSQL > 7.4 |
| Date: | 2005-12-09 11:06:34 |
| Message-ID: | 200512091206.35456.peter_e@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-interfaces pgsql-odbc |
Marc Herbert wrote:
> > I was thinking the ODBC driver should provide the appropriate
> > mapping.
>
> We aim to be as transparent as possible and avoid "mappings".
> <http://www.continuent.org/>
So continuent is now writing an ODBC driver for PostgreSQL, or what are
you trying to say?
> Moreover, the respective interfaces have very different semantics
> (pointer or not). This can be a reason in itself to prefer one or the
> other type, whatever the underlying implementation is.
This is handwaving. I know the section in the documentation; I wrote
it. But what actual reasons do you have for using one or the other?
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2005-12-09 11:08:44 | Re: BLOB handling compatibility with PostgreSQL > 7.4 |
| Previous Message | Marc Herbert | 2005-12-09 10:46:01 | Re: BLOB handling compatibility with PostgreSQL > 7.4 |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2005-12-09 11:08:44 | Re: BLOB handling compatibility with PostgreSQL > 7.4 |
| Previous Message | Ludek Finstrle | 2005-12-09 10:55:51 | Re: [ psqlodbc-Bugs-1000476 ] DateStyle and Transaction |