From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Nicolai Tufar <ntufar(at)gmail(dot)com>, devrim(at)kivi(dot)com(dot)tr, Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working |
Date: | 2005-12-04 22:09:42 |
Message-ID: | 200512042209.jB4M9g004208@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> > That got me through the backend compile and through libpq to ecpg, which
> > fell over at the link stage complaining about missing references to
> > pg_sprintf and pg_snprintf ... not sure how to fix that - windows
> > experts, please advise.
>
> Plan A would be to make libpq export pg_snprintf and friends, Plan B
> would be to give ecpg its own copy of snprintf.o. Plan A is probably
> better since you're going to hit the same issue no doubt in all of the
> src/bin programs.
I am confused why we would need either of these. All apps use
libpgport, and that pg_*printf should be in that library. The original
work Andrew did has problems particularly with ecpg, but why does ecpg
cause problems? Doesn't it link in pgport?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Zoltan Boszormenyi | 2005-12-04 22:10:37 | Re: SERIAL type feature request |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2005-12-04 21:49:31 | Re: SERIAL type feature request |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2005-12-04 23:08:09 | Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working |
Previous Message | Guillaume LELARGE | 2005-12-04 21:30:17 | Re: French po files |