From: | Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Harakiri <harakiri_23(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: deadlock detected - when multiple threads try to update |
Date: | 2005-12-03 16:01:15 |
Message-ID: | 20051203075953.Q19848@megazone.bigpanda.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, 2 Dec 2005, Harakiri wrote:
> Hi, thanks for the response ,
>
> >
> > It's hard to say with just the above. Are you doing
> > other things in the
> > transactions besides a single update of that table
> > and/or is the order of
>
> in each transaction i do basically the same stuff :
>
> insert 1 row into table A, B, C (B and C have a
> foreign key in A) without any sub queries - i just
> plainy insert data..
>
> then - update my table D row for today with some
> numbers (as described)
>
> > events consistent between the transactions? Does the
> > table have any
> > triggers, rules or foreign keys?
>
> The table D in question does not have any triggers,
> rules or foreign keys - it has only one PK and a few
> numeric fields.
>
> I dont understand why, when multiple connections do :
>
> T1
> update myTable set field1 = field1 + 1, field2 =
> field2 + 5000 where myID = 1;
>
> T2
> update myTable set field1 = field1 + 1, field2 =
> field2 + 2500 where myID = 1;
I don't immediately see a reason either if it's deadlocking on the myTable
changes. Can you build a self-contained example with schema?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-12-03 16:43:00 | Re: Reduce NUMERIC size by 2 bytes, reduce max length to 508 digits |
Previous Message | Thomas Pundt | 2005-12-03 15:52:34 | Re: Regular Expression Question |