| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: aclchk.c refactor |
| Date: | 2005-12-01 13:36:29 |
| Message-ID: | 20051201133629.GA31881@surnet.cl |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches pgsql-www |
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> I intend to apply later today the attached patch in order to reduce some
> code duplication in aclchk.c and clean a bit the API I just introduced
> in the previous patch. This reduces aclchk.c from 2377 lines to 2206.
I applied this patch yesterday, but I did not receive the commit
message. However I do see it in the online archives.
Is there something fishy going on here, or just the mail was lost on its
way here?
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Atsushi Ogawa | 2005-12-01 14:23:11 | Allow an alias for the target table in UPDATE/DELETE |
| Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2005-12-01 08:12:01 | Re: Check for integer overflow in datetime functions |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-12-01 15:28:34 | Re: [PATCHES] aclchk.c refactor |
| Previous Message | Richard Huxton | 2005-12-01 12:37:41 | Re: [pgsql-www] Upcoming PG re-releases |