Re: undefined behaviour for sub-transactions?

From: Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
Cc: Tim Bunce <Tim(dot)Bunce(at)pobox(dot)com>, Tyler MacDonald <tyler(at)yi(dot)org>, Jochen Wiedmann <jochen(dot)wiedmann(at)gmail(dot)com>, Paul DuBois <paul(at)snake(dot)net>, dbi-users(at)perl(dot)org, perl(at)lists(dot)mysql(dot)com, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: undefined behaviour for sub-transactions?
Date: 2005-11-30 21:58:15
Message-ID: 20051130215815.GA24946@winnie.fuhr.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 04:19:18PM -0500, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> But it's worth knowing that in Pg 8.1 and later, you can wrap such
> things in a subtransaction and get out of it that way.

Shouldn't that be 8.0 and later? That's when savepoints were
introduced. Or are you referring to something else?

--
Michael Fuhr

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Philippe Ferreira 2005-11-30 22:05:15 Switchover : WAL archiving and shutdown...
Previous Message Jaime Casanova 2005-11-30 21:44:28 Re: undefined behaviour for sub-transactions?