Re: someone working to add merge?

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Csaba Nagy <nagy(at)ecircle-ag(dot)com>
Cc: Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Jaime Casanova <systemguards(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: someone working to add merge?
Date: 2005-11-15 11:14:35
Message-ID: 20051115111435.GA25699@surnet.cl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Csaba Nagy wrote:

> session_1=> create table test (col smallint primary key);
> NOTICE: CREATE TABLE / PRIMARY KEY will create implicit index
> "test_pkey" for table "test"
> CREATE TABLE
> session_1=> begin;
> BEGIN
> cnagy=> insert into test values (1);
> INSERT 165068987 1
>
> session_2=> begin;
> BEGIN
> session_2=> insert into test values (1);
>
> [session_2 is now waiting]

This only happens because of the unique index. There's no predicate
locking involved. The btree code goes some lengths to make this work;
it would be probably simple to modify this to support MERGE or REPLACE
on the limited cases where there's a UNIQUE index. Tom has already said
this twice (on this thread only; he has already said it before IIRC.)

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2005-11-15 12:08:30 Re: Running PostGre on DVD
Previous Message Teodor Sigaev 2005-11-15 09:03:57 Re: [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL Weekly News - November 13 2005