Re: Old interfaces directory in CVS tree?

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: "Jeroen T(dot) Vermeulen" <jtv(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Old interfaces directory in CVS tree?
Date: 2005-11-07 17:02:11
Message-ID: 20051107130135.X993@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 7 Nov 2005, Andrew Dunstan wrote:

>
>
> Jeroen T. Vermeulen wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 09:46:15AM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>
>>
>>>> A libpqxx user just informed me that the anonymous CVS repository at
>>>> anoncvs.postgresql.org still contained a 2002 version of libpqxx in the
>>>> interfaces directory. I checked it out and otherwise it seems to be the
>>>> current source tree--at least I found an 8.1 version number somewhere.
>>>>
>>
>>
>>> you informant probably needs to use the -P option for cvs checkout.
>>>
>>
>> Doesn't make a difference. Besides, the outdated source is there even on
>> a fresh checkout.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> Oh, the top level interfaces directory. I misunderstood. Why is anybody
> checking that out at all? Are we keeping it for historical purposes?

Yes, since past releases did include it, so if we check out a previous
release, it needs to be able to pull those files as well ...

----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-11-07 17:07:27 Re: Interval aggregate regression failure (expected seems
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-11-07 16:19:20 Re: Another pgindent gripe