Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Rename the members of CommandDest enum so

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Rename the members of CommandDest enum so
Date: 2005-11-03 17:26:04
Message-ID: 20051103172603.GB8246@surnet.cl (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committerspgsql-hackers
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> 
> Is this an appropriate commit for post-Beta?  Does it fix a critical bug 
> that will prevent a release from happening? :(

Well, I asked -hackers before committing, and there were no objections,
plus there were a couple of messages that weren't actual encouragements
but I took as sign of approval.

The patch itself is pretty innocuous.  I will keep an eye on the
buildfarm in case it causes any problems.  It doesn't fix a bug in Pg
proper, but it allows PL/php to build.

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: markDate: 2005-11-03 17:28:02
Subject: Re: Reducing the overhead of NUMERIC data
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2005-11-03 17:24:01
Subject: Re: Exclusive lock for database rename

pgsql-committers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-11-03 17:34:03
Subject: pgsql: Fix the recently-added code that eliminates unnecessary
Previous:From: Marc G. FournierDate: 2005-11-03 17:17:33
Subject: Re: pgsql: Rename the members of CommandDest enum so

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group