| From: | Robert Creager <Robert(dot)Creager(at)Sun(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PGHackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Assert failure found in 8.1RC1 |
| Date: | 2005-11-02 23:19:42 |
| Message-ID: | 20051102161942.000047fd@C118181.stortek.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 15:19:44 -0500
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Creager <Robert(dot)Creager(at)Sun(dot)com> writes:
> > TRAP: FailedAssertion("!(shared->page_number[slotno] == pageno &&
> > shared->page_status[slotno] == SLRU_PAGE_READ_IN_PROGRESS)", File: "slru.c",
> > Line: 309)
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-10/msg01385.php
>
> If you can reproduce the failure with any reliability, please try
> one or both of the proposed patches:
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2005-10/msg00240.php
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2005-10/msg00248.php
>
Ran with both for an hour with no problem, where I could produce the ASSERT
failure within minutes for the non patched version.
Thanks,
Rob
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2005-11-02 23:28:25 | Re: [HACKERS] Reducing the overhead of NUMERIC data |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-11-02 23:12:37 | Re: [HACKERS] Reducing the overhead of NUMERIC data |