From: | Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Is Postgres comparable to MSSQL |
Date: | 2005-10-18 18:55:29 |
Message-ID: | 20051018185529.GJ3441@phlogiston.dyndns.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 12:11:59PM -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> Can we get any of that on the website somewhere?
Afilias has been a pretty open user (and we're not in the league of
some of those users, I understand). I have an unpleasant feeling
that I've contributed to the hold up of our case study's posting; but
in the meantime, if people want to use it, here's an old link with
the arguments we used to make PostgreSQL palatable to the ICANN
community. "What's a PostgreSQL" is not a question we hear much any
more, but in 2002 it was still a big problem:
http://icann.org/tlds/org/questions-to-applicants-13.htm
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
This work was visionary and imaginative, and goes to show that visionary
and imaginative work need not end up well.
--Dennis Ritchie
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Chris Travers | 2005-10-18 19:15:33 | Re: Is Postgres comparable to MSSQL |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2005-10-18 16:24:40 | Re: Is Postgres comparable to MSSQL |