Re: Is Postgres comparable to MSSQL

From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Is Postgres comparable to MSSQL
Date: 2005-10-18 18:55:29
Message-ID: 20051018185529.GJ3441@phlogiston.dyndns.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 12:11:59PM -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> Can we get any of that on the website somewhere?

Afilias has been a pretty open user (and we're not in the league of
some of those users, I understand). I have an unpleasant feeling
that I've contributed to the hold up of our case study's posting; but
in the meantime, if people want to use it, here's an old link with
the arguments we used to make PostgreSQL palatable to the ICANN
community. "What's a PostgreSQL" is not a question we hear much any
more, but in 2002 it was still a big problem:

http://icann.org/tlds/org/questions-to-applicants-13.htm

A

--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
This work was visionary and imaginative, and goes to show that visionary
and imaginative work need not end up well.
--Dennis Ritchie

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris Travers 2005-10-18 19:15:33 Re: Is Postgres comparable to MSSQL
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2005-10-18 16:24:40 Re: Is Postgres comparable to MSSQL