Re: searching array

From: Matthew Peter <survivedsushi(at)yahoo(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: searching array
Date: 2005-10-17 18:54:50
Message-ID: 20051017185450.70191.qmail@web35207.mail.mud.yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Yes. I did read it wrong. I wanted to find all records
that contained x where x >= 10000

I am using ANY in my query on my test box I copied the
ALL from example query in the docs, which still isn't
working for me.

--- Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> Matthew Peter <survivedsushi(at)yahoo(dot)com> writes:
> > Shouldn't >= also return Carols records since she
> > contains records GREATER THAN 10000?
>
> You seem to be reading the construct backwards.
>
> x >= ALL (array)
>
> is true if x >= every member of the array. This is
> clearly false
> for x = 10000 and array = {20000, 25000, 25000,
> 25000} ... in fact,
> x isn't >= any of those members.
>
> regards, tom lane
>


__________________________________
Yahoo! Music Unlimited
Access over 1 million songs. Try it free.
http://music.yahoo.com/unlimited/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-10-17 18:56:03 Re: Planner regression in 8.0.x ?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-10-17 18:50:39 Re: searching array